今天这篇文章主要是写给留学的大一新生们的，对于留学的大一新生来说很多都是萌新小白，为了让他们少走弯路，paperpal特意写了一篇如何提高大一GPA的文章，希望能帮助到你们，其实对于大一新生来说，如果第一年你就能把GPA4.0的话你后面的大学生活会很轻松的，如果第一年你GPA就很低的话，后面有的受的了。
如果你是文科类别的，那么你接触最多的就是essay作文了，无论大大小小的essay还是课堂上老师布置的作业，你都离不开它。其实essay这一项可以说所有人都要经历，如果你能先把essay攻破的话对于新手的你来说是最有效提供GPA的途径。而且还会时不时的有小作业或者实验报告，这些里面还会夹杂考试但这些都是必拿的分数。尤其是前两个学期的内容不算很多，这个时候是你完成质量最好的时间，如果你英语水平实在是跟不上的话，那你直接可以代修网课的机构来帮你润色一下论文，如果你是自己做的话，你要经常跟导师沟通联系，如果能约到一周见一次的话，那就一周一见，多跟导师沟通你的想法，其实大多数的导师都是很有善的。如果大一你就多走动与导师建立起了良好的关系的话，对你以后的发展是最为关键的。比任何学分都重要。
在英国一门课程的学分差不多在15分左右，只要不出现任何问题全部pass的话就能得到所有学分，但时间要求一般就是一个季度3个月的时间必须全部修完，如果你不想等大三一学期连休很多课程的话，就趁大一好好利用好这些时间，如果说你觉得刚去国外英语水平很低根本完成不好论文等要求的话怎么办，很简单找paperpal代修网课网啊，他们可以帮你代写essay、代修网课而且不会被学校发现。而且你在选择大学的时候，一定要看清楚该学科如果挂科的话能不能再重修或者补休，一般国外大学都可以的，但也有特殊的大学像是爱丁堡大学，他们就是不能补考，但只对于研究生。如果你真的挂科了，那么只好放弃继续读研的梦想了。
论文评分标准
Distinction:70+
Comprehensive coverage of relevant issues.
Independent and effective research and thinking.
Excellent organization and illustration of arguments.
Excellent range of reference to the appropriate primary and secondary sources.
Clear and lucid academic writing in a discriminating register.
Near-faultless presentation in accordance with the appropriate academic conventions.
Ethical issues central to all aspects of the project.
Thoughtful project informed by background reading and making excellent use of data.
Clear evaluation of methodological limitations.
Sophisticated, subtle and probing analysis throughout, with near-faultless use of linguistic terminology.
Merit:60–69
Thorough coverage of relevant issues.
Substantial evidence of effective research and independent thinking.
Very clear and effective organization and illustration of arguments.
Wide range of reference to the appropriate primary and secondary sources.
Clear academic writing in an appropriate register.
Very good presentation in accordance with appropriate academic conventions with evidence of careful proofreading and correction.
Careful and informed approach to ethical issues.
Thoughtful project design, with good use of data.
Detailed and thorough analysis throughout, with accurate use of linguistic terminology.
Pass:50–59
Fair coverage of relevant issues, but with some gaps.
Evidence of research, with some independent thinking.
A fair range of reference to the appropriate primary and secondary sources, but with some significant omissions.
Writing in an academic register with satisfactory levels of precision and clarity.
Good presentation in accordance with appropriate academic conventions, but evidence of insufficiently thorough proof-reading and of some shortcomings in referencing, bibliography, citation and matters of style.
Some thought given to ethical issues, and conforms to the University guidelines.
Coherently designed project, though not always acting on background reading or methodological limitations to analyse data effectively.
Some analysis offered in support of arguments, with largely accurate use of linguistic terminology.
Fail:40-49
Significant oversights in the coverage of relevant issues.
Little evidence of research.
Little critical analysis of texts and concepts.
Little evidence of independent thinking.
Weakly conceived, with a lack of clarity and purpose in the organization and illustration of the argument.
A limited range of reference to primary and secondary sources.
Writing in an inappropriate register, with lack of clarity and precision.
Inaccurate presentation, evidence of weak or inconsistent use of academic conventions, poor proof-reading and serious problems with referencing, bibliography, citation, formatting or style.
Does not fully conform to the University guidelines for ethical research.
Insubstantial project design producing little or poor analysis of data. Major methodological limitations.
Little or inaccurate analysis, with poor use of linguistic terminology or conventions.
Below 40Poor coverage of the topic.
Very little evidence of research.
Poor and/or derivative use of secondary sources.
Organization of material is incoherent, with serious errors in written expression and use of academic conventions.
Serious errors in use of linguistic terminology and conventions.
NB. Work which is plagiarised or unethical will incur penalties and may be awarded a mark of zero.
